us-stocks-analysis
US stocks analysis by an adversarial investment committee. Legendary-investor personas independently research a thesis, attack each other's cases against a shared evidence ledger (sentiment, smart money, SEC fundamentals), and reconcile into a plain-English verdict: the bottom line first, then w
as observed 2026-10-18T21:45:32.509Z- Identifier
us-stocks-analysis- Source
- ClawHub
- Version observed
- 2.10.1
- Source repository
- not published
- Repository observation
- No source repository listed
- First observed here
- 2026-08-28T22:06:37.311Z
- Observations recorded
- 10
- Installs (reported upstream)
- 31
- Weekly downloads (upstream)
- 3,340
- Declared license
- MIT-0
Observation history
2026-10-18T21:45:32.509Z
Fields that differed: changelog latestVersion
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
changelog |
"Moves the valuation and growth steps from annual history to quarterly and trailing figures, fixes 13F quarter selection, and treats free-tier previews as partial slices rather tha | "The API key is now optional to load this skill; with no key, a pointer leads to a temporary free key with no signup and a link the user opens to keep it." |
latestVersion |
"2.10.0" | "2.10.1" |
2026-10-02T07:46:18.975Z
Fields that differed: changelog latestVersion summary
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
changelog |
"Plain-English output: every verdict opens with a 2-3 sentence bottom line (conclusion, main reason, main risk). Reader-facing labels renamed: Opening cases, Challenges and replies | "Moves the valuation and growth steps from annual history to quarterly and trailing figures, fixes 13F quarter selection, and treats free-tier previews as partial slices rather tha |
latestVersion |
"2.9.0" | "2.10.0" |
summary |
"US stocks analysis by an adversarial investment committee: legendary-investor personas research a thesis, challenge each other on a shared evidence ledger (sentiment, smart money, | "US stocks analysis by an adversarial investment committee. Legendary-investor personas independently research a thesis, attack each other's cases against a shared evidence ledger |
2026-09-29T04:47:03.598Z
Fields that differed: summary
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
summary |
"US stocks analysis by an adversarial investment committee. Legendary-investor personas independently research a thesis, attack each other's cases against a shared evidence ledger | "US stocks analysis by an adversarial investment committee: legendary-investor personas research a thesis, challenge each other on a shared evidence ledger (sentiment, smart money, |
2026-09-27T02:45:50.156Z
Fields that differed: changelog latestVersion summary
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
changelog |
"Share-count trend reads weightedAverageSharesBasic and weightedAverageSharesDiluted, one basis per window; sharesOutstanding no longer referenced" | "Plain-English output: every verdict opens with a 2-3 sentence bottom line (conclusion, main reason, main risk). Reader-facing labels renamed: Opening cases, Challenges and replies |
latestVersion |
"2.8.0" | "2.9.0" |
summary |
"US stocks analysis by an adversarial investment committee. Legendary-investor personas independently research a thesis, attack each other's cases against a shared evidence ledger | "US stocks analysis by an adversarial investment committee. Legendary-investor personas independently research a thesis, attack each other's cases against a shared evidence ledger |
2026-09-18T20:20:38.833Z
Fields that differed: license changelog description latestVersion
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
license |
null | "MIT-0" |
changelog |
"Fundamentals now route to SentiSense first, with the filings source kept for line-item detail and provenance, plus the two fundamentals calls and their measured field behaviour; r | "Share-count trend reads weightedAverageSharesBasic and weightedAverageSharesDiluted, one basis per window; sharesOutstanding no longer referenced" |
description |
"US stocks analysis by an adversarial investment committee. Legendary-investor personas independently research a thesis, attack each other's cases against a shared evidence ledger | null |
latestVersion |
"2.7.2" | "2.8.0" |
2026-09-08T10:18:19.235Z
Fields that differed: changelog latestVersion
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
changelog |
"Rewrites the market-insights read against the real response keys so that workflow returns results again." | "Fundamentals now route to SentiSense first, with the filings source kept for line-item detail and provenance, plus the two fundamentals calls and their measured field behaviour; r |
latestVersion |
"2.7.1" | "2.7.2" |
2026-09-06T09:04:43.486Z
Fields that differed: changelog latestVersion
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
changelog |
"Resolve-before-fetch paragraph under Authentication (kb/entities/search, first non-null ticker, CLI exit 4 vs quiet REST empties), RESOLVE row in the Fetch Reference, and a Resolv | "Rewrites the market-insights read against the real response keys so that workflow returns results again." |
latestVersion |
"2.7.0" | "2.7.1" |
2026-09-02T06:49:02.991Z
Fields that differed: changelog latestVersion
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
changelog |
"Sharpen the analyst-consensus price caveat: the snapshot price and the live quote agree exactly right after a refresh and drift between them, so a single sample of the two proves | "Resolve-before-fetch paragraph under Authentication (kb/entities/search, first non-null ticker, CLI exit 4 vs quiet REST empties), RESOLVE row in the Fetch Reference, and a Resolv |
latestVersion |
"2.6.5" | "2.7.0" |
2026-09-01T06:16:18.534Z
Fields that differed: changelog latestVersion
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
changelog |
"CLI pin bumped to 0.47.1 (health output no longer echoes key material)" | "Sharpen the analyst-consensus price caveat: the snapshot price and the live quote agree exactly right after a refresh and drift between them, so a single sample of the two proves |
latestVersion |
"2.6.4" | "2.6.5" |
Correction
If you maintain this extension and believe anything above is inaccurate, request a correction. Corrections are published, and disputed entries are marked as disputed while under review.