Adversarial Review
开发完成后的三方对抗式代码评审闭环：蓝军（敌意审查，须给证据链）→ 第三方（独立审计，不信双方文档、只读代码，专找"修改引入的新缺陷"并稽核蓝军漏审的维度）→ 中立裁定（逐条采纳/驳回、审查双方共同前提）。当用户说"蓝军评审""第三方复核""对抗性审查""红蓝互搏""三方评审""交叉验证""发布前审查""帮我挑刺""adversarial review""red team review&
as observed 2026-09-28T03:46:57.521Z- Identifier
three-party-adversarial-review- Source
- ClawHub
- Version observed
- 2.5.1
- Source repository
- not published
- Repository observation
- No source repository listed
- First observed here
- 2026-09-27T02:45:50.156Z
- Observations recorded
- 2
- Installs (reported upstream)
- 1
- Weekly downloads (upstream)
- 160
- Declared license
- MIT-0
Observation history
2026-09-28T03:46:57.521Z
Fields that differed: changelog latestVersion
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
changelog |
"v2.3.0: 报告机检器的取证从全文计数改为逐条就近（外部评审 R1：数「复现命令」出现次数可被凑字数绕过）；模板 2 的 T 项总表改为与蓝军同构六列；新增能通过机检器的合规样例；突变测试扩到 18 条并把机检器自己列为靶子；check-docs 扩维（门禁/用例/版本/tag）；安装一行流改锚发布 tag。" | "v2.5.1: 装机自检的安装根改为自动发现（显式清单漏 Codex 根时曾对陈旧副本报\"全部安装根版本一致\"）；新增 6 用例回归测试接入 pre-commit 与 CI" |
latestVersion |
"2.3.0" | "2.5.1" |
Correction
If you maintain this extension and believe anything above is inaccurate, request a correction. Corrections are published, and disputed entries are marked as disputed while under review.