tech-content-review-panel
Reviews a tech/AI/industry research or in-depth analysis long-form article before publishing, via a fixed eight-role expert panel (target-reader reps, quality gatekeepers incl. fact+originality check, distribution gatekeeper) in an evaluate-then-optimize loop. Applies to tech/AI/data deep-dives, sec
as observed 2026-10-08T12:19:32.804Z- Identifier
tech-content-review-panel- Source
- ClawHub
- Version observed
- 1.2.1
- Source repository
- not published
- Repository observation
- No source repository listed
- First observed here
- 2026-08-28T22:06:37.311Z
- Observations recorded
- 3
- Installs (reported upstream)
- 1
- Weekly downloads (upstream)
- 1,003
- Declared license
- MIT-0
Observation history
2026-10-08T12:19:32.804Z
Fields that differed: license changelog description latestVersion
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
license |
null | "MIT-0" |
changelog |
"Add Step R post-draft reader-fit test (R0-R5: positioning lock, role selection, feedback triage, conflict resolution); soften contrast-structure red line to a density-based rule; | "Add title-anchor gate: editor role must verify headline carries a concrete anchor (who/scenario/problem); abstract or filename-style titles are must-fix" |
description |
"Reviews a tech/AI/industry research or in-depth analysis long-form article before publishing, via a fixed eight-role expert panel (target-reader reps, quality gatekeepers incl. fa | null |
latestVersion |
"1.2.0" | "1.2.1" |
2026-09-08T10:18:19.295Z
Fields that differed: changelog latestVersion
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
changelog |
"Add not_for routing field (agent-consumption-first design per skill-design-guide Principle Two)" | "Add Step R post-draft reader-fit test (R0-R5: positioning lock, role selection, feedback triage, conflict resolution); soften contrast-structure red line to a density-based rule; |
latestVersion |
"1.1.2" | "1.2.0" |
Correction
If you maintain this extension and believe anything above is inaccurate, request a correction. Corrections are published, and disputed entries are marked as disputed while under review.