TheBotique

session-closeout

Run a read-only end-of-session audit of the current workspace and report what still needs attention. Checks for git repos with uncommitted changes, MASTER_TODO.md freshness, and optionally whether named project docs were updated today. Writes nothing and runs nothing it finds in the workspace. Use o

as observed 2026-09-10T12:18:05.764Z
Identifier
session-closeout
Source
ClawHub
Version observed
1.1.1
Source repository
not published
Repository observation
No source repository listed
First observed here
2026-09-09T11:17:27.097Z
Observations recorded
2
Installs (reported upstream)
15
Weekly downloads (upstream)
701

Observation history

2026-09-10T12:18:05.764Z

Fields that differed: changelog description latestVersion summary

FieldBeforeAfter
changelog "Security-first refresh: no builder execution or hook sourcing, explicit-only trigger, status computed before the memory write, CLOSEOUT_PROJECTS check implemented, MIT license, po "Read-only audit: every write removed (no daily-memory append, no mkdir), no environment-controlled workspace or projects paths, project slugs validated, git status run with core.f
description "Run a read-only end-of-session closeout for an OpenClaw workspace and append one closeout block to today's daily memory file. Checks for dirty git repos, MASTER_TODO.md freshness, "Run a read-only end-of-session audit of the current workspace and report what still needs attention. Checks for git repos with uncommitted changes, MASTER_TODO.md freshness, and o
latestVersion "1.1.0" "1.1.1"
summary "Run a read-only end-of-session closeout for an OpenClaw workspace and append one closeout block to today's daily memory file. Checks for dirty git repos, MASTER_TODO.md freshness, "Run a read-only end-of-session audit of the current workspace and report what still needs attention. Checks for git repos with uncommitted changes, MASTER_TODO.md freshness, and o

Correction

If you maintain this extension and believe anything above is inaccurate, request a correction. Corrections are published, and disputed entries are marked as disputed while under review.