receiving-code-revie
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performat... Use when 需要Development领域自动化处理、数据分析和流程编排时使用。不适用于无明确需求的模糊场景。
as observed 2026-09-24T00:36:14.127Z- Identifier
receiving-code-review- Source
- ClawHub
- Version observed
- 1.0.0
- Source repository
- not published
- Repository observation
- No source repository listed
- First observed here
- 2026-08-28T22:06:37.311Z
- Observations recorded
- 5
- Installs (reported upstream)
- 0
- Weekly downloads (upstream)
- 107
- Declared license
- MIT-0
Observation history
2026-09-24T00:36:14.127Z
Fields that differed: changelog displayName summary topics
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
changelog |
"Initial release of the \"receiving-code-review\" skill.\n\n- Guides on handling code review feedback with technical rigor, not performative agreement.\n- Step-by-step process: rea | "v2.3 quality enhancement - security audit + marketing packaging + slug-content validation" |
displayName |
"receiving-code-review" | "receiving-code-revie" |
summary |
"Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verificat | "Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verificat |
topics |
[] | ["code","receiving","review"] |
2026-09-19T21:21:32.220Z
Fields that differed: license changelog displayName latestVersion summary
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
license |
null | "MIT-0" |
changelog |
"- Improved description clarity; fixed frontmatter description to match actual skill purpose and triggers.\n- Added explicit purpose, metadata, and structured compliance nodes in l | "Initial release of the \"receiving-code-review\" skill.\n\n- Guides on handling code review feedback with technical rigor, not performative agreement.\n- Step-by-step process: rea |
displayName |
"Receiving Code Review" | "receiving-code-review" |
latestVersion |
"1.0.2" | "1.0.0" |
summary |
"changelog: Enhanced with ClawHub metadata, expanded examples, and rationalization prevention" | "Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verificat |
2026-08-29T23:02:09.653Z
Fields that differed: changelog description displayName latestVersion summary topics
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
changelog |
"v2.3 quality enhancement - security audit + marketing packaging + slug-content validation" | "- Improved description clarity; fixed frontmatter description to match actual skill purpose and triggers.\n- Added explicit purpose, metadata, and structured compliance nodes in l |
description |
"Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verificat | null |
displayName |
"receiving-code-revie" | "Receiving Code Review" |
latestVersion |
"1.0.0" | "1.0.2" |
summary |
"Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verificat | "changelog: Enhanced with ClawHub metadata, expanded examples, and rationalization prevention" |
topics |
["code","receiving","review"] | [] |
2026-08-28T22:54:39.947Z
Fields that differed: changelog description displayName latestVersion summary topics
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
changelog |
"- Improved description clarity; fixed frontmatter description to match actual skill purpose and triggers.\n- Added explicit purpose, metadata, and structured compliance nodes in l | "v2.3 quality enhancement - security audit + marketing packaging + slug-content validation" |
description |
null | "Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verificat |
displayName |
"Receiving Code Review" | "receiving-code-revie" |
latestVersion |
"1.0.2" | "1.0.0" |
summary |
"changelog: Enhanced with ClawHub metadata, expanded examples, and rationalization prevention" | "Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verificat |
topics |
[] | ["code","receiving","review"] |
Correction
If you maintain this extension and believe anything above is inaccurate, request a correction. Corrections are published, and disputed entries are marked as disputed while under review.