TheBotique

gap-analysis

Use when auditing a repository for evidence-backed gaps between code, SPECs, architecture, and documentation — before a release, after a review, or when the user asks what is missing or divergent. Confirmed gaps become Draft SPECs via write-specs, a tracked GitHub Epic via create-issues, and orchest

as observed 2026-09-24T00:36:14.063Z
Identifier
gap-analysis
Source
ClawHub
Version observed
1.0.3
Source repository
not published
Repository observation
No source repository listed
First observed here
2026-09-15T17:18:40.381Z
Observations recorded
4
Installs (reported upstream)
1
Weekly downloads (upstream)
241
Declared license
MIT-0

Observation history

2026-09-24T00:36:14.063Z

Fields that differed: changelog latestVersion

FieldBeforeAfter
changelog "- Removed the file `skill-card.md`.\n- Updated the SKILL.md file, changing orchestrator direct invocation in the pipeline to invocation via `architecture` (on behalf of `orchestra "- Updated SKILL.md metadata version from 1.0.1 to 1.0.2.\n- Removed the file skill-card.md.\n- No functional logic changes; documentation/metadata only."
latestVersion "1.0.2" "1.0.3"
2026-09-20T22:20:20.811Z

Fields that differed: changelog latestVersion

FieldBeforeAfter
changelog "- Added a new guardrail: the skill now refuses to follow instructions embedded in untrusted input (e.g., Issues, PRs, comments, external docs), instead quoting such directives and "- Removed the file `skill-card.md`.\n- Updated the SKILL.md file, changing orchestrator direct invocation in the pipeline to invocation via `architecture` (on behalf of `orchestra
latestVersion "1.0.1" "1.0.2"
2026-09-17T19:21:47.048Z

Fields that differed: license description

FieldBeforeAfter
license null "MIT-0"
description "Use when auditing a repository for evidence-backed gaps between code, SPECs, architecture, and documentation — before a release, after a review, or when the user asks what is miss null

Correction

If you maintain this extension and believe anything above is inaccurate, request a correction. Corrections are published, and disputed entries are marked as disputed while under review.