us-tech-giant-analyst
This skill should be used when a user asks to analyze a US-listed technology giant such as Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, or Tesla. It produces a deep, data-rich, and visually structured investment-and-competitive analysis with charts and valuation tables, covering business model,
as observed 2026-08-31T05:56:02.339Z- Identifier
financialstatement- Source
- ClawHub
- Version observed
- 1.0.1
- Source repository
- not published
- Repository observation
- No source repository listed
- First observed here
- 2026-08-29T23:02:09.653Z
- Observations recorded
- 2
- Installs (reported upstream)
- 0
- Weekly downloads (upstream)
- 100
Observation history
2026-08-31T05:56:02.339Z
Fields that differed: changelog description latestVersion summary
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
changelog |
"Initial release of US Tech Giant Analyst skill.\n\n- Provides structured, six-part investment and competitive analysis for major US-listed technology companies.\n- Covers business | "**Major update with deeper, more visual analysis and stricter data standards:**\n\n- Produces a rich, visually-structured HTML & markdown report, including summary cards, valuatio |
description |
"This skill should be used when a user asks to analyze a US-listed technology giant such as Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, or Tesla. It produces a structured inv | "This skill should be used when a user asks to analyze a US-listed technology giant such as Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, or Tesla. It produces a deep, data-ric |
latestVersion |
"1.0.0" | "1.0.1" |
summary |
"This skill should be used when a user asks to analyze a US-listed technology giant such as Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, or Tesla." | "This skill should be used when a user asks to analyze a US-listed technology giant such as Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, or Tesla. It produces a deep, data-ric |
Correction
If you maintain this extension and believe anything above is inaccurate, request a correction. Corrections are published, and disputed entries are marked as disputed while under review.