critical-thinking
Use for critical thinking, or when the user wants a claim, plan or decision checked for weak spots: "is this right?", "what am I missing?", "poke holes", "sanity check", "devil's advocate", "red team this". Skip for execution-only tasks
as observed 2026-10-06T10:50:34.888Z- Identifier
critical-thinking- Source
- ClawHub
- Version observed
- 2026.10.5
- Source repository
- not published
- Repository observation
- No source repository listed
- First observed here
- 2026-08-28T22:06:39.940Z
- Observations recorded
- 4
- Installs (reported upstream)
- 16
- Weekly downloads (upstream)
- 828
- Declared license
- MIT-0
Observation history
2026-10-06T10:50:34.888Z
Fields that differed: license changelog description displayName latestVersion summary
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
license |
null | "MIT-0" |
changelog |
"Initial release – distills Neil Browne's \"Asking the Right Questions\" (12th edition) into a practical, step-by-step critical thinking toolkit.\n\n- Provides a structured method | "Release version: 2026.10.5" |
description |
"【批判性思维·学会提问】把尼尔·布朗《学会提问》（第12版）蒸馏成程序化、可套用的论证拆解与评估方法论。覆盖：论证结构拆解（论题/结论/理由/证据/假设）、10个批判性问题清单、逻辑谬误识别模板、证据效力判定（个人经历/案例/证言/权威/观察/调查研究）、替代原因与相关性≠因果、数据欺骗检查、省略信息清单、灰度结论与条件句、认知偏见防御（系统1/确认偏误/ | null |
displayName |
"批判性思维·学会提问" | "critical-thinking" |
latestVersion |
"1.0.0" | "2026.10.5" |
summary |
"【批判性思维·学会提问】把尼尔·布朗《学会提问》（第12版）蒸馏成程序化、可套用的论证拆解与评估方法论。覆盖：论证结构拆解（论题/结论/理由/证据/假设）、10个批判性问题清单、逻辑谬误识别模板、证据效力判定（个人经历/案例/证言/权威/观察/调查研究）、替代原因与相关性≠因果、数据欺骗检查、省略信息清单、灰度结论与条件句、认知偏见防御（系统1/确认偏误/ | "Use for critical thinking, or when the user wants a claim, plan or decision checked for weak spots: \"is this right?\", \"what am I missing?\", \"poke holes\", \"sanity check\", \ |
2026-08-29T23:02:09.822Z
Fields that differed: changelog description displayName summary topics
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
changelog |
"Initial release: installs an idempotent Challenge the Direction rule into AGENTS.md after explicit approval." | "Initial release – distills Neil Browne's \"Asking the Right Questions\" (12th edition) into a practical, step-by-step critical thinking toolkit.\n\n- Provides a structured method |
description |
"Install a durable Challenge the Direction rule into an agent's AGENTS.md after explicit user approval." | "【批判性思维·学会提问】把尼尔·布朗《学会提问》（第12版）蒸馏成程序化、可套用的论证拆解与评估方法论。覆盖：论证结构拆解（论题/结论/理由/证据/假设）、10个批判性问题清单、逻辑谬误识别模板、证据效力判定（个人经历/案例/证言/权威/观察/调查研究）、替代原因与相关性≠因果、数据欺骗检查、省略信息清单、灰度结论与条件句、认知偏见防御（系统1/确认偏误/ |
displayName |
"Critical Thinking" | "批判性思维·学会提问" |
summary |
"Install a durable Challenge the Direction rule into an agent's AGENTS.md after explicit user approval." | "【批判性思维·学会提问】把尼尔·布朗《学会提问》（第12版）蒸馏成程序化、可套用的论证拆解与评估方法论。覆盖：论证结构拆解（论题/结论/理由/证据/假设）、10个批判性问题清单、逻辑谬误识别模板、证据效力判定（个人经历/案例/证言/权威/观察/调查研究）、替代原因与相关性≠因果、数据欺骗检查、省略信息清单、灰度结论与条件句、认知偏见防御（系统1/确认偏误/ |
topics |
["agents-md","critical-thinking","decision-quality"] | [] |
2026-08-28T22:54:39.947Z
Fields that differed: changelog description displayName summary topics
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
changelog |
"Initial release – distills Neil Browne's \"Asking the Right Questions\" (12th edition) into a practical, step-by-step critical thinking toolkit.\n\n- Provides a structured method | "Initial release: installs an idempotent Challenge the Direction rule into AGENTS.md after explicit approval." |
description |
"【批判性思维·学会提问】把尼尔·布朗《学会提问》（第12版）蒸馏成程序化、可套用的论证拆解与评估方法论。覆盖：论证结构拆解（论题/结论/理由/证据/假设）、10个批判性问题清单、逻辑谬误识别模板、证据效力判定（个人经历/案例/证言/权威/观察/调查研究）、替代原因与相关性≠因果、数据欺骗检查、省略信息清单、灰度结论与条件句、认知偏见防御（系统1/确认偏误/ | "Install a durable Challenge the Direction rule into an agent's AGENTS.md after explicit user approval." |
displayName |
"批判性思维·学会提问" | "Critical Thinking" |
summary |
"【批判性思维·学会提问】把尼尔·布朗《学会提问》（第12版）蒸馏成程序化、可套用的论证拆解与评估方法论。覆盖：论证结构拆解（论题/结论/理由/证据/假设）、10个批判性问题清单、逻辑谬误识别模板、证据效力判定（个人经历/案例/证言/权威/观察/调查研究）、替代原因与相关性≠因果、数据欺骗检查、省略信息清单、灰度结论与条件句、认知偏见防御（系统1/确认偏误/ | "Install a durable Challenge the Direction rule into an agent's AGENTS.md after explicit user approval." |
topics |
[] | ["agents-md","critical-thinking","decision-quality"] |
Correction
If you maintain this extension and believe anything above is inaccurate, request a correction. Corrections are published, and disputed entries are marked as disputed while under review.