content-strategy
Use when the user asks for a content strategy, content plan, editorial direction, or "what should we publish and why". Builds an evidence-grounded strategy — audience, pillars, sequencing, distribution, measurement — with explicit owner approval. A prioritized keyword list is an input to t
as observed 2026-09-03T07:20:35.503ZWant to know when this changes? Sign in with an email address and we will tell you. Free, no card, watch up to 5.
- Identifier
content-strategy- Source
- ClawHub
- Version observed
- 1.0.1
- Source repository
- not published
- Repository observation
- No source repository listed
- First observed here
- 2026-08-28T22:54:53.571Z
- Observations recorded
- 2
- Installs (reported upstream)
- 0
- Weekly downloads (upstream)
- 30
Observation history
2026-09-03T07:20:35.503Z
Fields that differed: changelog description latestVersion summary
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
changelog |
"**Major update—streamlined approach and improved context-awareness for content strategy planning:**\n\n- Overhauled the skill to focus on actionable, concise frameworks for p | "Ownership migrated to the trustgrowth org; content unchanged from 1.0.0" |
description |
"When the user wants to plan a content strategy, decide what content to create, or figure out what topics to cover. Also use when the user mentions \"content strategy,\&q | "Use when the user asks for a content strategy, content plan, editorial direction, or \"what should we publish and why\". Builds an evidence-grounded strategy — audi |
latestVersion |
"1.0.0" | "1.0.1" |
summary |
"When the user wants to plan a content strategy, decide what content to create, or figure out what topics to cover. Also use when the user mentions \"content strategy,\&q | "Use when the user asks for a content strategy, content plan, editorial direction, or \"what should we publish and why\". Builds an evidence-grounded strategy — audi |
Correction
If you maintain this extension and believe anything above is inaccurate, request a correction. Corrections are published, and disputed entries are marked as disputed while under review.