TheBotique

Code Review

Conduct thorough multi-axis code reviews assessing correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance before merging any changes, with severit...

as observed 2026-09-24T00:36:14.127Z
Identifier
code-review
Source
ClawHub
Version observed
0.1.0
Source repository
not published
Repository observation
No source repository listed
First observed here
2026-08-28T22:06:26.689Z
Observations recorded
6
Installs (reported upstream)
0
Weekly downloads (upstream)
18
Declared license
MIT-0

Observation history

2026-09-24T00:36:14.127Z

Fields that differed: license changelog description displayName latestVersion summary topics

FieldBeforeAfter
license null "MIT-0"
changelog "Release v0.17.0" "Initial release of multi-dimensional code review skill.\n\n- Reviews code changes before merge across five axes: correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance.
description "Production-readiness code review at either scope — the uncommitted working tree (default) or a committed branch grouped per `#NNN` task (references/branch-review.md). Hunts DRY vi null
displayName "code-review" "Code Review"
latestVersion "1.0.2" "0.1.0"
summary "Production-readiness code review at either scope — the uncommitted working tree (default) or a committed branch grouped per `#NNN` task (references/branch-review.md). Hunts DRY vi "Conduct thorough multi-axis code reviews assessing correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance before merging any changes, with severit..."
topics [] ["intelligent-code-review"]
2026-09-15T17:18:40.381Z

Fields that differed: changelog description latestVersion summary topics

FieldBeforeAfter
changelog "- 完善 SKILL.md,增加更详细的使用指南,包含组件目录结构、核心工作流说明、报告输出规则与常见问题入口。\n- 明确三大工作流适用场景、执行规范,增加跨仓库联调与并行审查策略指引。\n- 新增技能安装、环境依赖准备的分步文档路由和参考链接。\n- 明确报告归档、忽略与误报问题处理机制。\n- 提供完整的文档目录与具体指引,方便用户快速查找所需信息。 "Release v0.17.0"
description "代码审查 Skill - 自动化代码质量检查与报告生成工具。支持从 GitHub 等仓库克隆代码、执行多维度代码质量检查、生成结构化审查报告并按场景保存与分发。当用户提到\"代码审查\"、\"code review\"、\"检查代码质量\"、\"审查报告\"等审查操作时,或当用户明确提到对 code-review(本技能)执行\"安装 / 更新 / 升级\ "Production-readiness code review at either scope — the uncommitted working tree (default) or a committed branch grouped per `#NNN` task (references/branch-review.md). Hunts DRY vi
latestVersion "1.3.8" "1.0.2"
summary "代码审查 Skill - 自动化代码质量检查与报告生成工具。支持从 GitHub 等仓库克隆代码、执行多维度代码质量检查、生成结构化审查报告并按场景保存与分发。当用户提到\"代码审查\"、\"code review\"、\"检查代码质量\"、\"审查报告\"等审查操作时,或当用户明确提到对 code-review(本技能)执行\"安装 / 更新 / 升级\ "Production-readiness code review at either scope — the uncommitted working tree (default) or a committed branch grouped per `#NNN` task (references/branch-review.md). Hunts DRY vi
topics ["automation","code","code-review","python","quality-assurance"] []
2026-09-10T12:18:05.764Z

Fields that differed: changelog description latestVersion summary topics

FieldBeforeAfter
changelog "Release v0.16.1" "- 完善 SKILL.md,增加更详细的使用指南,包含组件目录结构、核心工作流说明、报告输出规则与常见问题入口。\n- 明确三大工作流适用场景、执行规范,增加跨仓库联调与并行审查策略指引。\n- 新增技能安装、环境依赖准备的分步文档路由和参考链接。\n- 明确报告归档、忽略与误报问题处理机制。\n- 提供完整的文档目录与具体指引,方便用户快速查找所需信息。
description "Production-readiness code review at either scope — the uncommitted working tree (default) or a committed branch grouped per `#NNN` task (references/branch-review.md). Hunts DRY vi "代码审查 Skill - 自动化代码质量检查与报告生成工具。支持从 GitHub 等仓库克隆代码、执行多维度代码质量检查、生成结构化审查报告并按场景保存与分发。当用户提到\"代码审查\"、\"code review\"、\"检查代码质量\"、\"审查报告\"等审查操作时,或当用户明确提到对 code-review(本技能)执行\"安装 / 更新 / 升级\
latestVersion "1.0.1" "1.3.8"
summary "Production-readiness code review at either scope — the uncommitted working tree (default) or a committed branch grouped per `#NNN` task (references/branch-review.md). Hunts DRY vi "代码审查 Skill - 自动化代码质量检查与报告生成工具。支持从 GitHub 等仓库克隆代码、执行多维度代码质量检查、生成结构化审查报告并按场景保存与分发。当用户提到\"代码审查\"、\"code review\"、\"检查代码质量\"、\"审查报告\"等审查操作时,或当用户明确提到对 code-review(本技能)执行\"安装 / 更新 / 升级\
topics [] ["automation","code","code-review","python","quality-assurance"]
2026-08-29T23:02:09.653Z

Fields that differed: changelog description latestVersion summary

FieldBeforeAfter
changelog "- Introduced a dual-axis review architecture, separating code quality (Standards) and requirements alignment (Spec) into isolated review phases.\n- Added detailed frameworks for b "Release v0.16.1"
description "Review code on two axes — Standards (code quality) and Spec (requirements alignment). Supports multi-agent parallel review, visual review, and file-based handoffs." "Production-readiness code review at either scope — the uncommitted working tree (default) or a committed branch grouped per `#NNN` task (references/branch-review.md). Hunts DRY vi
latestVersion "2.2.0" "1.0.1"
summary "Review code on two axes — Standards (code quality) and Spec (requirements alignment). Supports multi-agent parallel review, visual review, and file-based handoffs." "Production-readiness code review at either scope — the uncommitted working tree (default) or a committed branch grouped per `#NNN` task (references/branch-review.md). Hunts DRY vi
2026-08-28T22:54:39.947Z

Fields that differed: changelog description latestVersion summary

FieldBeforeAfter
changelog "Release v0.16.1" "- Introduced a dual-axis review architecture, separating code quality (Standards) and requirements alignment (Spec) into isolated review phases.\n- Added detailed frameworks for b
description "Production-readiness code review at either scope — the uncommitted working tree (default) or a committed branch grouped per `#NNN` task (references/branch-review.md). Hunts DRY vi "Review code on two axes — Standards (code quality) and Spec (requirements alignment). Supports multi-agent parallel review, visual review, and file-based handoffs."
latestVersion "1.0.1" "2.2.0"
summary "Production-readiness code review at either scope — the uncommitted working tree (default) or a committed branch grouped per `#NNN` task (references/branch-review.md). Hunts DRY vi "Review code on two axes — Standards (code quality) and Spec (requirements alignment). Supports multi-agent parallel review, visual review, and file-based handoffs."

Correction

If you maintain this extension and believe anything above is inaccurate, request a correction. Corrections are published, and disputed entries are marked as disputed while under review.