adversarial-debate
Cross-vendor adversarial review. WARNING — this sends your brief, and any source files you approve, to a model hosted by a THIRD-PARTY vendor, where it stays in that vendor's session history under their retention terms. Ship a plan, proposal, or design to a model from a DIFFERENT vendor to attac
as observed 2026-09-20T22:20:20.811Z- Identifier
adversarial-debate- Source
- ClawHub
- Version observed
- 2.4.0
- Source repository
- not published
- Repository observation
- No source repository listed
- First observed here
- 2026-08-28T22:06:26.689Z
- Observations recorded
- 4
- Installs (reported upstream)
- 1
- Weekly downloads (upstream)
- 368
- Declared license
- MIT-0
Observation history
2026-09-20T22:20:20.811Z
Fields that differed: license changelog description latestVersion summary
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
license |
null | "MIT-0" |
changelog |
"Methodology upgrade, not just wording. R1 objections now require a verifiable anchor (file:line, runnable command, citable data) plus a mandatory closing question: what's the fail | "Removes the handoff/DeepSeek channel. It launched the external model with permission prompts off, so that model could run commands as the user, which the staging-directory flow co |
description |
"Cross-vendor adversarial review. Ship a plan, proposal, or design to a model from a DIFFERENT vendor to attack it; every objection carries a verifiable anchor; the defender rules | null |
latestVersion |
"2.2.0" | "2.4.0" |
summary |
"Cross-vendor adversarial review. Ship a plan, proposal, or design to a model from a DIFFERENT vendor to attack it; every objection carries a verifiable anchor; the defender rules | "Cross-vendor adversarial review. WARNING — this sends your brief, and any source files you approve, to a model hosted by a THIRD-PARTY vendor, where it stays in that vendor's sess |
2026-08-31T05:56:02.339Z
Fields that differed: changelog description latestVersion summary
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
changelog |
"Dropped the keyword list from the description, stopped naming an unpinned install command, and added a 'What this skill sends where' section: the brief is transmitted verbatim to | "Methodology upgrade, not just wording. R1 objections now require a verifiable anchor (file:line, runnable command, citable data) plus a mandatory closing question: what's the fail |
description |
"Cross-vendor adversarial review. Ship a plan, proposal, or design to a model from a DIFFERENT vendor to attack it; the defender rules on every objection; a final round converges o | "Cross-vendor adversarial review. Ship a plan, proposal, or design to a model from a DIFFERENT vendor to attack it; every objection carries a verifiable anchor; the defender rules |
latestVersion |
"2.1.1" | "2.2.0" |
summary |
"Cross-vendor adversarial review. Ship a plan, proposal, or design to a model from a DIFFERENT vendor to attack it; the defender rules on every objection; a final round converges o | "Cross-vendor adversarial review. Ship a plan, proposal, or design to a model from a DIFFERENT vendor to attack it; every objection carries a verifiable anchor; the defender rules |
2026-08-29T23:02:09.653Z
Fields that differed: changelog description latestVersion summary
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
changelog |
"P3 is executable again: the handoff CLI is a public package (uv tool install handoff-cli), and its resume subcommand keeps R1 and R3 on one conversation, which is exactly what thi | "Dropped the keyword list from the description, stopped naming an unpinned install command, and added a 'What this skill sends where' section: the brief is transmitted verbatim to |
description |
"Cross-vendor adversarial review. Ship a plan, proposal, or design to a model from a DIFFERENT vendor to attack it; the defender rules on every objection; a final round converges o | "Cross-vendor adversarial review. Ship a plan, proposal, or design to a model from a DIFFERENT vendor to attack it; the defender rules on every objection; a final round converges o |
latestVersion |
"2.1.0" | "2.1.1" |
summary |
"Cross-vendor adversarial review. Ship a plan, proposal, or design to a model from a DIFFERENT vendor to attack it; the defender rules on every objection; a final round converges o | "Cross-vendor adversarial review. Ship a plan, proposal, or design to a model from a DIFFERENT vendor to attack it; the defender rules on every objection; a final round converges o |
Correction
If you maintain this extension and believe anything above is inaccurate, request a correction. Corrections are published, and disputed entries are marked as disputed while under review.